Concierge Medicine vs. Direct Primary Care: A Structural Comparison
Understanding the Differences Between Two Membership-Based Practice Models
HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE
Concierge Medicine Today. "Concierge Medicine vs. Direct Primary Care: A Structural Comparison." CMT Knowledge Library. 2026. conciergemedicinetoday.net/knowledge-library
DISCLAIMER
This article is provided for educational and informational purposes only and should not be interpreted as medical, legal, financial, or regulatory advice. Healthcare practice models vary widely depending on jurisdiction, regulatory environment, and individual physician circumstances. Physicians and healthcare organizations should consult qualified advisors when evaluating practice structures or contractual arrangements.
INTRODUCTION
Concierge medicine and Direct Primary Care (DPC) are often discussed together as examples of membership-based healthcare models. Both approaches seek to strengthen the physician–patient relationship by redesigning the structure of medical practice — typically through smaller patient panels and recurring membership fees.
Despite these similarities, concierge medicine and direct primary care differ in several important ways, including their financial structure, operational priorities, relationship with insurance, and typical implementation within the healthcare system.
Confusion between the two models is common in media coverage and policy discussions. This article provides a structural comparison designed to clarify how concierge medicine and DPC typically operate in practice. The goal is not to advocate for one model over another, but to provide a clear framework for understanding the differences between these two approaches to membership-based healthcare.
SCALE AND CURRENT PREVALENCE
Before examining structural differences, it is useful to understand the relative scale of each model within the broader healthcare landscape.
Research published in Health Affairs examining national data from 2018 to 2023 found that the number of direct primary care and concierge practice sites grew by 83.1 percent and the number of clinicians participating in them by 78.4 percent during that period. This represents one of the fastest-growing segments of primary care delivery in the United States. conciergemedicinetoday
Despite this growth, membership-based models remain a small fraction of overall physician practice. In 2024, the United States had 1,032,365 active physicians, of which 866,460 were direct patient care physicians. CMT estimates that approximately 4,000 to 6,000 concierge and membership-based practices currently operate in the U.S. — representing well under two percent of the practicing physician workforce. MGMA
On the DPC side specifically, a 2024 AAFP data brief found that 9% of family physicians reported operating a DPC practice — a significant increase from prior years — and that 94% of DPC physicians were satisfied with their overall practice, compared to 57% of those not in a DPC practice. DPC physicians were also less likely to report burnout, with 49% saying they were experiencing no level of burnout, compared to just 14% of non-DPC physicians. MGMA
These figures reflect a field that, while still small relative to the overall physician workforce, is experiencing meaningful and sustained growth.
SHARED CHARACTERISTICS OF MEMBERSHIP-BASED CARE
Both concierge medicine and direct primary care emerged partly in response to structural pressures within modern healthcare — including increasing administrative workload, documentation requirements associated with electronic health records, and limited time for physician–patient interaction.
Primary care clinicians have expressed growing interest in concierge and direct primary care practices, which often feature smaller patient panels and greater clinical autonomy compared with traditional primary care models. conciergemedicinetoday
A widely cited study published in Annals of Internal Medicine found that physicians in ambulatory practice spend nearly two hours on electronic health record and administrative tasks for every hour of direct patient care.¹
Both concierge medicine and DPC commonly share:
Smaller patient panels
Recurring membership or retainer fees
Greater physician accessibility
Longer appointment times
Stronger emphasis on continuity of care
However, the structure and philosophy behind these models differ in important ways.
STRUCTURAL DIFFERENCE 1: RELATIONSHIP WITH INSURANCE
One of the most significant distinctions between concierge medicine and direct primary care involves how the practice interacts with the insurance system.
Concierge Medicine
Most concierge medical practices operate alongside the traditional insurance system. Patients typically maintain health insurance coverage, and physicians may bill insurance for covered services.
The membership or retainer fee paid to the practice generally supports services that are not easily reimbursed through insurance billing, such as extended appointment times, enhanced access to physicians, care coordination, and communication outside traditional visits.
Peer-reviewed research published in JAMA describes concierge medicine as a retainer-based practice model in which patients pay an annual fee in exchange for enhanced services and physician accessibility.² However, concierge practices vary in structure. Some operate hybrid models, while others may adopt cash-only approaches depending on regulatory considerations and physician preferences.
Direct Primary Care
Direct Primary Care typically follows a different structure. Most DPC practices do not bill insurance for primary care services. Instead, patients pay a recurring monthly fee directly to the practice in exchange for a defined set of primary care services.
This approach is designed to simplify billing and reduce administrative workload associated with insurance documentation.
Research examining DPC has described the model as a practice structure designed to remove insurance billing from the primary care encounter and replace it with a direct financial relationship between physician and patient.³
STRUCTURAL DIFFERENCE 2: PRICING AND PAYMENT DESIGN
Another commonly discussed distinction involves how the membership fee is structured — and at what price point.
Concierge Medicine
Concierge medicine pricing varies widely depending on geographic location, services offered, and practice structure. Based on CMT's ongoing field reporting, typical fee ranges across the three main concierge models are:
Bespoke concierge medicine (the original model, serving ultra-high-net-worth patients): approximately $10,000 to $40,000 per patient annually, sometimes higher
Contemporary concierge medicine (the most common model, also called patient-centered medical practice or PCM): approximately $1,500 to $5,000 per patient annually
Hybrid concierge models: pricing varies based on the scope of services included in the membership
Concierge practices often design their pricing around a service-oriented experience, emphasizing personalized access, communication, and care coordination.
Direct Primary Care
Most DPC practices operate with monthly membership fees, typically in the range of $50 to $150 per patient per month, though fees vary significantly by practice, geography, and the scope of services included. Because DPC practices generally avoid insurance billing, pricing is frequently designed to cover the core services delivered by the practice on a sustainable, predictable basis.
STRUCTURAL DIFFERENCE 3: OPERATIONAL PRIORITIES
Although both models emphasize improved physician–patient relationships, their operational priorities often differ.
Concierge Medicine frequently emphasizes patient experience and accessibility, care coordination across specialists and hospitals, personalized service and communication, and integration with the broader healthcare system. Some concierge practices incorporate service-oriented design principles influenced by hospitality and customer experience models.
Direct Primary Care practices often emphasize simplified payment structures, reduced administrative overhead, transparent pricing, and independence from insurance billing. Advocates of DPC frequently highlight the model's potential to reduce physician administrative workload and restore time for clinical care.
STRUCTURAL DIFFERENCE 4: EMPLOYER RELATIONSHIPS
Another difference between the models involves employer participation.
Some DPC practices have developed direct contracts with employers, allowing companies to provide primary care services to employees through a per-member-per-month arrangement. Research on DPC practice distribution has found that 47% of DPC practices are located in rural or partially rural areas, suggesting the model has found traction in geographies where traditional primary care access is limited. MGMA
Concierge medicine, by contrast, has historically operated as a direct physician–patient membership relationship rather than an employer-sponsored service. While employer-sponsored concierge programs exist, employer contracting is more commonly associated with DPC models and, increasingly, with the broader direct care market.
STRUCTURAL DIFFERENCE 5: INTEGRATION WITH HEALTH SYSTEMS
Concierge medicine has sometimes appeared within hospital systems or large physician groups, often as part of executive health programs or enhanced-access primary care offerings. These programs may provide smaller patient panels and expanded physician access while operating within broader healthcare organizations.
Direct Primary Care practices, in contrast, more commonly operate as independent physician-owned practices. National data shows that the share of clinicians in concierge and direct primary care practices who were physicians declined from 67.3 percent to 59.7 percent between 2018 and 2023, while the proportion of advanced practice clinicians increased — reflecting a broader workforce shift within both models. Imedclaims
VARIATION WITHIN BOTH MODELS
It is important to emphasize that neither concierge medicine nor direct primary care represents a single standardized model.
Within concierge medicine, practice structures may include hybrid concierge practices, full membership practices, specialty concierge programs, and hospital-affiliated concierge services.
Within DPC, variations may include independent physician practices, employer-contracted practices, and community-focused primary care clinics.
Because of this variation, comparisons between the two models should focus on structural characteristics rather than rigid definitions.
WHY THESE DISTINCTIONS MATTER
Understanding the differences between concierge medicine and direct primary care is important for physicians, policymakers, employers, and patients evaluating alternative care delivery models. These distinctions influence regulatory considerations, insurance relationships, pricing structures, operational design, and patient experience.
Both models have grown substantially in the past five years, and as healthcare continues to evolve, both represent meaningful attempts to redesign clinical practice in ways that support stronger physician-patient relationships and more sustainable practice environments. conciergemedicinetoday
For physicians evaluating either model, the most important question is not which model is better in the abstract — but which structure best fits their patient population, their local market, their financial situation, and the kind of practice they want to build and sustain over the long term.
SOURCES & CITATIONS
Sinsky C, Colligan L, Li L, et al. Allocation of Physician Time in Ambulatory Practice. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2016. DOI: 10.7326/M16-0961. acpjournals.org
Alexander GC, Kurlander J, Wynia MK. Physicians in Retainer ('Concierge') Practice. Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA). 2005. jamanetwork.com
Eskew PM, Klink K. Direct Primary Care: Practice Distribution and Cost Across the Nation. Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine. 2015;28(6):793–801. jabfm.org
Adashi EY et al. Growth In Number Of Practices And Clinicians Participating In Concierge And Direct Primary Care, 2018–23. Health Affairs. 2025;44(12):1473–1481. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2025.00656. healthaffairs.org
American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP). Answers to Six Common Questions About Direct Primary Care. 2024 DPC data brief. Updated October 2025. aafp.org
Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC). 2025 Key Findings — Physician Workforce Data. aamc.org
Goldstein ND et al. Is the Growth of Direct Primary Care Expanding Health Care Access Where It's Needed Most? Drexel University Dornsife School of Public Health. November 2024. newsblog.drexel.edu
Concierge Medicine Today. Industry Estimates — Concierge and Membership Medicine. 2026. conciergemedicinetoday.net
RELATED CMT KNOWLEDGE LIBRARY ARTICLES
ABOUT THIS ARTICLE
This article is part of the CMT Knowledge Library — an independent reference body documenting the concierge and membership medicine field for physicians, healthcare leaders, consultants, investors, and journalists. All articles include citations and are updated periodically. Content is for educational and informational purposes only.
© 2026 Concierge Medicine Today, LLC. All rights reserved.