Membership Medicine Models, Prices and Panel Sizes | CMT

Educational content only. Not medical, legal, tax, financial or accounting advice. Read the disclaimer.

Concierge Medicine TodayCMT Research Brief No. 81 · Practice Models · November 2026
Research Brief No. 81Practice ModelsPrimary evidence: Population Data

Models, Terminology and Numbers: The CMT Models and Pricing Map

Membership medicine now covers at least ten distinct models. They differ in who pays, whether insurance is billed, what a panel looks like and what it costs. This brief defines each one in CMT's own terms and puts sourced numbers beside it. It also states plainly where the numbers do not exist yet.

A numbers companion to Research Brief No. 37, The Membership Medicine Models, Compared, which covers each structure's legal rules.

By Concierge Medicine Today, Editorial Research · Published November 2026 · Version 1.1 (Nov. 9, 2026: added a census by model with specialty concierge and direct specialty care shown separately; earlier the same day with interviews of health law attorneys and a transaction advisor) · External review: not yet reviewed · About 14 minutes

Start here: the questions this brief answers

The 30-second answer. Concierge medicine and direct primary care are separate models, and both are different from telehealth subscriptions, retail memberships and NP-led or PA-led membership practices. Independent researchers counted 3,036 membership medicine sites in 2023 (concierge and DPC combined), about 60% of them concierge.1 Panel sizes and fees are well documented for DPC and thin for concierge. CMT publishes counts and price bands by model rather than a list of practices. A list would go stale quickly and could read as an endorsement.

What counts as concierge medicine, and what does not?

A membership fee plus, in most cases, continued insurance billing. Practices that drop insurance entirely sit closer to DPC. Go to the full answer ↓

How did CMT get its concierge number?

Four published steps from the Health Affairs count, with DPC removed. See the math ↓

How many practices and clinicians are there?

3,036 sites and 7,021 clinicians in 2023, concierge and DPC combined. CMT estimates 3,000 to 6,000 concierge physicians. Go to the full answer ↓

How many practices, clinicians and patients are in each model?

Only DPC has independent practice counts. Concierge relies on one combined study, company figures and CMT inference, and several models have no public count at all. See the census ↓

How big is a panel in each model?

A 2005 national survey found 898 patients per retainer physician vs. 2,303 in traditional practice. DPC panels are reported separately. Go to the full answer ↓

What does each model cost?

DPC has published averages near $98 to $99 a month. No methodology-disclosed concierge average exists. Go to the full answer ↓

Why doesn't CMT publish a practice directory?

Independence, accuracy and liability. CMT publishes the map, not the list. Go to the full answer ↓

Written for: Physicians exploring a modelNPs and PAsPractice leadersJournalistsResearchers

Part 1 · Terminology

Ten models, defined in CMT's terms

Practices name themselves loosely, and the same word can mean different things in different markets. CMT sorts models by four first-principles questions: Who pays? Is insurance billed? Who holds the panel? What does the fee buy? Filter the models below or search a term.

Showing 10 of 10 models

Traditional concierge medicineMembership fee plus insurance billing
Who pays
Patient pays an annual or monthly fee; insurance and Medicare are billed for covered services.
Insurance
Usually billed. Medicare-enrolled physicians may charge the fee only for non-covered services and amenities.3
Typical panel
Small; see Part 3.
Read more
CMT Basics
Luxury and bespoke conciergeHigh-touch, very small panels, often no insurance
Who pays
Individual, family or corporate retainer, often annual.
Insurance
Varies; many do not bill.
Typical panel
Very small; no published benchmark.
Read more
Luxury and access healthcare
Hybrid or segmented practiceA membership tier alongside a traditional panel
Who pays
Members pay a fee; non-members are seen through insurance.
Insurance
Billed for all patients.
Note
Counted inconsistently across studies. CMT reports hybrids separately.
Health system and executive health programsConcierge run by a hospital or system
Who pays
Patient or employer, often annual.
Insurance
Usually billed for covered care.
Trend
Health law attorneys report more large systems now run their own concierge or executive health programs. Executive health programs often add assessments but not same-day personal access.4
Read more
CMT Research Brief No. 7
Direct primary care (DPC)Flat periodic fee, no insurance billing
Who pays
Patient, family or employer, usually monthly.
Insurance
Not billed for clinical services. Qualifying arrangements up to $150 a month may be paid from an HSA from 2026.5
Read more
CMT Research Brief No. 21
Employer, onsite and network DPCSponsored by an employer, union or network
Who pays
Employer or union, per employee per month.
Insurance
Not billed for primary care.
Read more
CMT Research Brief No. 35
Direct specialty careMembership or cash-pay outside primary care
Who pays
Patient, by membership or published cash price.
Insurance
Varies by practice.
Examples
Pediatrics (sometimes called direct pediatric care), cardiology, women's health, podiatry, dermatology, psychiatry.
Read more
CMT Research Brief No. 6
NP-led, PA-led and nurse-led membershipNon-physician clinicians holding their own panels
Who pays
Concierge or DPC structures, depending on the practice.
Scope
Depends on state scope-of-practice law.
Trend
The NP and PA share of membership medicine clinicians (concierge and DPC combined) rose from 23% to 40%, 2018 to 2023.1
Read more
CMT Research Brief No. 18
Telehealth subscriptionsVirtual-only access for a periodic fee
Who pays
Patient or employer.
Note
No continuity with a named physician is guaranteed in many plans. Not counted as concierge or DPC by CMT.
Retail and consumer-brand membershipsMembership access through a large consumer company
Who pays
Patient, often a low annual fee, with insurance billed for visits.
Note
Access-focused rather than small-panel. CMT reports these separately and does not count them as concierge.

Why labels mislead. Healthcare attorney Jim Eischen, who has spent about 15 years structuring cash-pay practices, told CMT that the labels are brand names, not predictable models. Before he looks at any label, he asks: Is the practice in Medicare? Is it in network? What exactly is sold for cash? How is it charged?6

Attorney commentary on the CMT DocPreneur Leadership Podcast. Educational, not legal advice. Practice Insight

CMT's editorial position. No model is better than another. Each answers a different question about time, trust and sustainability. Precise terms make sure the numbers for one model are not quoted as numbers for another.

Part 2 · The counts

What has been counted, and by whom

3,036

Membership medicine sites in 2023, concierge and DPC combined. Likely an undercount.

Population Data

Zhu et al., Health Affairs, 20251

~60%

Share of those sites that were concierge, or about 1,800 sites by CMT's arithmetic.

Population Data

Health Affairs, 20251

+83%

Growth in membership medicine sites, 2018 to 2023, concierge and DPC combined.

Population Data

Health Affairs, 20251

3,000 to 6,000

U.S. concierge physicians, concierge only. CMT estimate with a published method.

Industry Research

CMT Research Brief No. 287

ModelBest available countSourceEvidence type
Concierge (all forms)About 1,800 sites (2023); 3,000 to 6,000 physicians (CMT estimate)Health Affairs; CMT Brief No. 281,7Population DataIndustry Research
Largest single concierge network1,400+ physicians; 430,000+ members (MDVIP, company-reported)MDVIP, Feb. 20268Industry Research
Hybrid, luxury, health systemNo separate public countGap 
Direct specialty careNo national countGap 
Telehealth subscriptions; retail membershipsNot counted as membership medicine by CMTDefinitional 

A wider lens: cash-pay care beyond the two brands. Jim Eischen estimates that no more than about 3,000 practices fit the two branded categories (national-network-style concierge and DPC combined). That is close to the 3,036 sites Health Affairs counted. He also estimates that 20,000 to 40,000 U.S. health professionals practice some form of cash-pay care outside insurance networks, including virtual care sold for cash.6

Expert estimate from 15 years of practice formation work; method not published. It is not a concierge count and should not be cited as one. Practice Insight

Show the math: how CMT gets from public data to a concierge-only number

Concierge figures and DPC figures are calculated separately. Steps 1 and 2 use public data anyone can check. Step 3 uses assumptions CMT publishes in full in Brief No. 28.

Start with the only national count. Health Affairs identified 3,036 membership medicine sites in 2023. This is concierge and DPC combined, and the authors call it an undercount.1

3,036 sites

Take out DPC. About 60% of those sites were concierge. 3,036 × 0.60 = 1,822.1

~1,800 concierge sites

Adjust for the undercount and convert sites to physicians. CMT applies published, labeled assumptions about missed practices and physicians per site. Every assumption and its range is in Brief No. 28.2

Ranges, not a point

Result: the CMT Concierge Estimate 2026. About 3,000 to 6,000 U.S. concierge physicians in roughly 2,000 to 4,500 sites. Concierge only; DPC is not included.2

3,000 to 6,000

Direct primary care · a different model · the DPC side of the same math

Step 2 leaves about 40% of the 2023 sites as DPC: 3,036 × 0.40 = about 1,200 sites in the Health Affairs count.1 A separate vendor estimate puts DPC practices at about 3,600.3 The gap shows how much counting methods matter.

These figures describe DPC, not concierge medicine, and are shown separately for context only.

Why older numbers you may see are larger

Figure in circulationWhat it actually coversMethod published?Use today
12,000 to 13,000 physiciansPhysicians running any subscription program, an earlier CMT estimate quoted by a concierge consulting firm. Not concierge only.9NoDo not cite as a concierge count
8,000 to 12,000 practicesAll membership medicine: concierge, DPC and hybrid practices with a membership tier.2NoCite only as a combined field estimate
3% to 5% growth a yearEarlier CMT estimate from physician and consultant input.9NoSuperseded by measured growth (+83%, 2018 to 2023, combined)
3,000 to 6,000 physiciansConcierge onlyYesCite this for concierge

CMT corrects in the open: the earlier estimates were not wrong so much as they measured a wider field without saying so.

Ownership is a model dimension too

84% → 60%

Share of membership medicine practices that were independently owned, 2018 to 2023, concierge and DPC combined. Corporate affiliation grew fastest.

Population Data

Health Affairs, 20251

4 partner types

Private equity, family offices, hospitals and health systems, and other large private or public companies. Each approaches a deal differently; family offices often hold longer than private equity's typical three to five years.

Practice Insight

Herschman and Jacoby, CMT podcast, 202510

Why consolidation is reaching concierge medicine. On the CMT DocPreneur Leadership Podcast, Dana Jacoby (Vector Medical Group) named four pressures pushing practices toward outside partners: administrative load pulling physicians away from patients; the cost of security, IT and membership systems; marketing against better-funded entrants; and succession and recruiting.10 Gary Herschman (Baker Donelson) said agreements he negotiates bar investors from directing clinical care, which corporate practice of medicine laws also require in many states. He also said buyers typically ask selling physicians to stay at least five years.10

Advisor and attorney commentary; both work on these transactions. Educational, not legal or financial advice. CMT Research Brief No. 34 covers succession, sale or stay. Practice Insight

Direct primary care · a different model · DPC counts

About 3,600 DPC practices nationwide, a Hint Health estimate cited by the DPC Alliance.11 Hint reports platform data from more than 2,700 clinicians and 1.4 million members.12 Industry Research

These figures describe DPC, not concierge medicine, and are shown separately for context only.

Part 2b · The census by model

How many practices, clinicians and patients are in each model?

CMT went model by model and kept only figures it could trace to a named source. Each figure is labeled by how it was produced. Where nobody publishes a number, the chart says so instead of filling the gap. Specialty concierge and direct specialty care are shown as separate rows because they work differently: one keeps billing insurance, the other usually does not.

The one national anchor: 3,036 membership medicine sites and 7,021 clinicians in 2023, concierge and DPC combined (Health Affairs).1 Every row below is a slice, a company figure or a CMT inference. Rows do not add up to a total.
Independent count or surveyCompany-reportedCMT inference (math shown)Not publicly counted Concierge familyDirect care family (different model)Other

Log scale. Bar length compares orders of magnitude, not exact ratios.

Tap any row for its sources and caveats.

What is known, and what is not

Each cell shows how well a measure is documented for each model. Most of the map is still blank. That gap is the finding.

The panel-size ladder

Patients per clinician, smallest to largest, on one log scale. Years and definitions differ, so read this for scale, not precision.

How CMT built the inferences. Concierge patients: 3,000 to 6,000 physicians7 × 400 to 600 patients each (MDVIP caps panels at 600;30 many practices run smaller) = roughly 1.2 to 3.6 million patients. Employer-funded DPC: 60% of 1.4 million members on one platform12 = about 840,000, a floor for that platform only. NP and PA clinicians: 40.3% of 7,021 clinicians1 = about 2,830, concierge and DPC combined. These are CMT estimates, not counts.

Industry Research CMT inference, method shown.

Direct primary care · a different model · why the DPC rows look fuller

DPC has independent trackers (the DPC Frontier mapper listed 3,163 practices in September 202625), an association survey (about 3,600 practices estimated11) and a billing platform that publishes member counts.12 Concierge has no equivalent registry. These figures describe DPC, not concierge medicine, and are shown separately for context.

Part 3 · Panel size by model

Smaller panels are the mechanism, not a perk

Panel size is what turns a membership into time. Bar lengths are drawn to scale.

Direct primary care · a different model · DPC panel size

AAFP Direct Primary Care data briefs.14 Practice Insight Separately, the DPC Alliance reports that mature DPC panels cluster at 400 to 700 patients.11 Bars use the same scale as the chart above.

These figures describe DPC, not concierge medicine, and are shown separately for context only.

A concierge consulting firm describes typical concierge panels as about 400 to 600 patients, vs. 2,500 to 3,000 in traditional practice, without citing a source.9 Industry Research

What CMT can add today. No newer national concierge panel figure has been published since 2005, so CMT does not estimate one. The Editor-in-Chief's view, from the CMT Media Desk:

“Fewer patients doesn't mean less care; it means more intentional care.”

“I think there will always be a need for a doctor and patient to have a close relationship.”9

Michael Tetreault, Editor-in-Chief, Concierge Medicine Today. Editorial views, not research findings. A concierge-only panel median and range by specialty is a planned question in the 2027 CMT practice survey.

Part 4 · Price bands

What each model costs, and how sure we are

ModelPublished price evidenceConfidenceEvidence type
Traditional conciergeAnnual retainers commonly in the thousands of dollars; no methodology-disclosed national average. One health law attorney who structures concierge practices says most fees she sees fall between about $1,000 and $8,000 a year.4LowPopulation DataPractice Insight1
Luxury and bespokeNo public benchmarkNone 
Health system programsExample: $2,500 a year at one South Florida health system program (2024). Large systems in Chicago, Cleveland, Philadelphia and Florida run concierge programs.15Single examplesIndustry Research
HybridNo public benchmarkNone 
Telehealth, retailVaries by company; set by each companyNot compiled 
Direct primary care · a different model · DPC price bands
FigureWhat it measuresSourceEvidence type
$98.46Average monthly fee, 465 physician survey responses (data collected Oct. to Nov. 2024)DPC Alliance, 202611Practice Insight
$105.93 / $99.28 / $77.74Average fee for panels under 200 / 201 to 500 / over 500DPC Alliance, 202611Practice Insight
$99Median retail monthly price, 2025 (vendor platform data)Hint Health, 202612Industry Research
$55 to $66Median employer-sponsored monthly range since 2020 (vendor platform data)Hint Health, 202612Industry Research
$150HSA-eligible ceiling, individual ($300 family), from 2026IRS Notice 2026-55Policy and Law

These figures describe DPC, not concierge medicine, and are shown separately for context only. The two survey and platform figures agree closely ($98 to $99), even though they come from different methods.

The other monthly fee: what Medicare already pays for connection

$536M

Medicare and Medicare Advantage payments for remote patient monitoring in 2024, up 31% from 2023.

Population Data

HHS OIG, Aug. 202516

~1M

Medicare enrollees who received remote patient monitoring in 2024.

Population Data

HHS OIG, Aug. 202516

4,639

Medical practices that routinely billed Medicare for remote patient monitoring in 2024.

Population Data

HHS OIG, Aug. 202516

$15M

The same payments in 2019, when Medicare first covered the service widely.

Population Data

HHS OIG, via summary16

Jim Eischen calls remote monitoring and chronic care management Medicare's own version of a monthly connection fee.17 OIG is watching the growth for fraud risk, so CMT shows these figures as context on demand, not as a revenue recommendation.

Price is a choice of market, not a measure of value. Jim Eischen says his clients charging about $6,000 a year can deliver care worth $40,000 to some patients. In his view, the real question is who a physician wants to serve for the next decade.6

Attorney commentary; anecdotal; not a benchmark. Practice Insight

Why the fee's wording matters. OIG has twice resolved cases in which practices that accept Medicare assignment charged beneficiaries membership fees for access-style benefits: once in 2007, and again in April 2025 for about $860,000 in penalties and refunds combined.18 What a fee buys, and how it is described, affects both Medicare compliance and whether pre-tax health accounts can pay it. CMT Research Brief No. 33 covers the Medicare rules.

Two attorneys, one core rule. Chicago health law attorney Jonna Eimer stresses that a practice still in Medicare or commercial plans cannot charge members for anything those plans already cover. She also cautions against marketing an "annual exam" that overlaps a covered physical.4 Jim Eischen frames compliant fees around routine exams that Medicare excludes by statute.17 The framing differs; the rule underneath is the same. Have qualified counsel review your own agreement.

Public OIG enforcement records. Educational only; consult qualified counsel. Policy and Law

First-principles question. A fee is only meaningful next to the panel it supports. In the DPC data, smaller panels charge more. CMT expects the same relationship in concierge medicine but has no data to show it yet.

Part 5 · The map, not the list

Why CMT publishes counts and price bands, not a practice directory

Lists go stale

Practices change fees, stop taking patients, drop insurance or close. One public finder discloses checking 1,921 of 5,091 listings against the practice's own website over about six weeks (Sept. 23 to Nov. 2, 2026).19

Lists read as endorsement

A listing on an industry publication's site can look like approval. CMT does not vet or endorse practices, sponsors or vendors, and a directory would blur that line.

Maps answer the real question

Physicians, reporters and policymakers mostly ask how many, where, at what price and in which models. Aggregated, sourced counts answer that without ranking anyone.

The Editor's view

“For nearly two decades, everyone guessed how big this field is, including us. The guessing is over. In any industry, authority belongs to whoever shows their math. So we're showing ours.”

Michael Tetreault, Editor-in-Chief, Concierge Medicine Today. From the CMT Media Desk.

“A directory tells you who's out there. It doesn't tell you who's right for you, and it can look like an endorsement we never gave. We'd rather show physicians and patients the whole landscape, with our sources, and let them choose.”

Michael Tetreault, Editor-in-Chief, Concierge Medicine Today, November 2026. Editorial views. That is why CMT publishes counts with their method, not a list of names.

The 2027 CMT Models and Pricing Map: what it will publish

DimensionPublished asSource plan
Model (the 10 above)Counts and shareSourced research plus the 2027 CMT practice survey
SpecialtyCounts by specialty, concierge and direct care separately2027 CMT practice survey
StateCounts in bands (for example, 1 to 10, 11 to 50), never named practicesPublic sources, with dates
PriceBands with sample size and dateOnly where n is 30 or more per band
Panel sizeMedian and range by model2027 CMT practice survey

What CMT already has: the specialty mix of its readers

Beyond primary care. “Ten years ago, concierge medicine was mostly a primary care story. Today we hear from cardiologists, endocrinologists, OB-GYNs, gastroenterologists and oncologists exploring the model.”

Michael Tetreault, Editor-in-Chief, CMT Media Desk. Editorial view. Because this is a business model rather than a specialty, exact counts by specialty or state do not exist yet. The 2027 CMT practice survey will collect them, and state counts will be published in bands only.

Learn → Build → Lead

Learn

Name your model with the four questions: who pays, whether insurance is billed, who holds the panel and what the fee buys.

Build

Set your fee and panel together. Use published figures for your own model only, with the source and date.

Lead

When patients or reporters ask, use precise terms. Don't quote a DPC number as a concierge number, or the reverse.

Methods, limitations and evidence types

How this brief was built

CMT reviewed published research, association surveys, vendor reports and federal guidance available as of November 9, 2026. Concierge and DPC figures were kept separate throughout. Combined figures are labeled "concierge and DPC combined," and DPC-only figures appear only in dashed DPC boxes. The ten model definitions are CMT's editorial taxonomy, not a legal or regulatory classification.

Every key finding is labeled by evidence type. Labels describe the type of evidence, not its value. Each type answers different questions. Funding is disclosed on every source.

Evidence typeWhat it coversBest for
Clinical Trial EvidenceRandomized trials and systematic reviewsCause and effect
Population DataLarge observational studies and government dataTrends at scale
Practice InsightSurveys, smaller studies and expert consensusReal-world experience
Industry ResearchCompany-sponsored or company-reported data, not peer-reviewedEarly signals and operating data
Policy and LawStatutes, regulation and official guidanceWhat is required

What we don't know

  • A current national concierge panel size or fee average with a published method.
  • Counts of hybrid, luxury, health system and direct specialty practices.
  • How many NP-led, PA-led or nurse-led practices run a membership model, by state.
  • Whether DPC price-to-panel patterns hold in concierge medicine.

How to cite this brief

Concierge Medicine Today. Models, Terminology and Numbers: The CMT Models and Pricing Map. CMT Research Brief No. 81. November 2026.

External review: not yet reviewed. Corrections: CMT corrects errors in the open and notes what changed and why.

Related CMT Research Briefs

No. 28 · Counting Concierge

The census standard and the CMT Concierge Estimate 2026.

Read the brief

No. 29 · Fee Benchmarks

What membership fees can and cannot tell you.

Read the brief

No. 37 · The Models, Compared

Legal structure and rules for each model.

Read the brief

References

  1. Zhu JM, et al. Growth of membership medicine practices, 2018 to 2023. Health Affairs, December 2025. healthaffairs.org. Summary via carey.jhu.edu.Funding: not stated
  2. HHS Office of Inspector General. OIG Alert on charging Medicare beneficiaries for services already covered, 2004. hhs.gov.Funding: federal (HHS)
  3. Eimer JD (Roetzel & Andress, Chicago). Interview on the CMT DocPreneur Leadership Podcast, Concierge Medicine Today: "From Chicago to Florida: concierge law isn't one-size-fits-all," 2025. Listen on CMT Legal Commentary. Attorney commentary; educational, not legal advice.Funding: Concierge Medicine Today (self-produced; not a sponsored episode)
  4. Internal Revenue Service. Notice 2026-5. irs.gov.Funding: federal (IRS)
  5. Eischen J. Interview on the CMT DocPreneur Leadership Podcast, Concierge Medicine Today, "Cash healthcare, Medicare and compliance: how does it really work?" 2025. Listen on CMT Legal Commentary. Attorney commentary; educational, not legal advice.Funding: Concierge Medicine Today (self-produced; no outside funder)
  6. Concierge Medicine Today. CMT Concierge Estimate 2026. CMT Research Brief No. 28, October 2026. conciergemedicinetoday.net.Funding: Concierge Medicine Today (self-conducted; no outside funder)
  7. MDVIP. Press release: 100 consecutive quarters of growth, February 2026. mdvip.com.Funding: industry (MDVIP)
  8. Castle Connolly Private Health Partners. Want a deeper relationship with your doctor? Why more patients are choosing concierge medicine. Blog post, October 14 (year not shown). ccphp.net. Published by a firm that helps physicians convert to a membership model; quotes Michael Tetreault.Funding: industry (Castle Connolly Private Health Partners; company website)
  9. Herschman GW (Baker Donelson) and Jacoby D (Vector Medical Group). "Why are there so many concierge practice transactions?" CMT DocPreneur Leadership Podcast, 2025. Listen on CMT Legal Commentary. Guests advise on practice transactions.Funding: Concierge Medicine Today (self-produced; not a sponsored episode)
  10. Direct Primary Care Alliance, Member Insights Committee. State of Direct Primary Care. Data collected Oct. to Nov. 2024; published July 2026. dpcnews.com. Summary via medicaleconomics.com and blog.hint.com.Funding: not stated (conducted and published by the DPC Alliance; distribution support from Hint Health)
  11. Hint Health. 2026 Direct Primary Care Trends Report. get.hint.com. Median prices as reported in Hint's November 2026 DPC Day graphic; the full report was not independently reviewed by CMT.Funding: industry (Hint Health)
  12. Alexander GC, et al. Physicians in retainer ("concierge") practice: a national survey of physician, patient and practice characteristics. J Gen Intern Med, 2005. pure.johnshopkins.edu.Funding: not stated
  13. American Academy of Family Physicians. 2024 and 2026 Direct Primary Care Data Briefs. aafp.org (2024); aafp.org (2026).Funding: not stated (conducted and published by AAFP)
  14. Health News Florida / WUSF. Concierge care: Some Florida hospitals cash in on a private equity-backed trend. April 6, 2024. wusf.org.Funding: not stated (news report)
  15. HHS Office of Inspector General. Data Snapshot: Billing for Remote Patient Monitoring in Medicare, August 2025. Summary via kslaw.com and natlawreview.com.Funding: federal (HHS OIG)
  16. Eischen J. Interview on the CMT DocPreneur Leadership Podcast, Concierge Medicine Today, 2025 (OIG, remote monitoring and HSA updates). Listen on CMT Legal Commentary. Attorney commentary.Funding: Concierge Medicine Today (self-produced; no outside funder)
  17. HHS Office of Inspector General. Civil monetary penalty enforcement records: assignment-agreement cases involving membership fees, May 2007 and April 23, 2025. oig.hhs.gov; archived OIG list.Funding: federal (HHS OIG)
  18. Publicly posted listing-verification statement on a commercial practice finder, viewed November 2026 (operator not named in this brief).Funding: not stated (company website)
  19. Concierge Medicine Today. Reader poll: specialties represented, 2014 to 2024 (300 respondents). conciergemedicinetoday.net/media-desk.Funding: Concierge Medicine Today (self-conducted; no outside funder)
  20. MD². Press release: MD² expands to Chevy Chase, February 2026. md2.com.Funding: not stated (company press release)
  21. AZ Big Media. MD² Scottsdale: the concierge practice that redefines what personal doctor means, 2026. azbigmedia.com.Funding: not stated (news report)
  22. Private Medical. Press release: Private Medical opens seventh location in Greenwich, September 2, 2026. businesswire.com.Funding: not stated (company press release)
  23. Concierge Choice Physicians. Press release: Sharon X. Li, MD, now offering the Hybrid Choice program, July 10, 2026. mchllp.com.Funding: not stated (company press release)
  24. Healio. Direct primary care gains momentum as experts weigh benefits and tradeoffs, September 1, 2026 (citing the DPC Frontier mapper). healio.com.Funding: not stated (news report)
  25. Hint Health. Employer Trends in Direct Primary Care, 2025. get.hint.com.Funding: not stated (conducted and published by Hint Health)
  26. Cottrill A, Ochieng N, Newman T. How many physicians have opted out of the Medicare program? KFF, January 17, 2025. kff.org.Funding: not stated (KFF, independent nonprofit)
  27. SigmaMD. Direct-care psychiatry: membership models for practices that left insurance behind, 2026. sigmamd.com.Funding: not stated (software vendor blog)
  28. Fit Tech Global. Amazon acquires One Medical in US$3.9bn deal, 2022 (One Medical member count at announcement). fittechglobal.com.Funding: not stated (news report of company figures)
  29. Morefield B, et al. MDVIP and Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries with diabetes. American Journal of Managed Care, March 2020. ajmc.com.Funding: industry (MDVIP-related study; see article disclosures)
Disclaimer

This brief is educational and informational only. It is not medical, legal, tax, financial or accounting advice. Consult qualified professionals about your situation.

Concierge Medicine Today is independent. No one pays for favorable coverage, no practice model is favored, and funding is disclosed for every source. CMT does not vet or endorse any practice, sponsor, vendor or company named or described here.

This brief reflects sources available at publication and is not without possible error or omission. © 2007-2026 Concierge Medicine Today, LLC.